Yesterday, in a 6–3 decision in Trump v. CASA, the United States Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration in a case ...

A review of the US Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. CASA, Inc., which held that federal district courts’ universal ...

Federal agencies across government can resume laying off their employees en masse after the Supreme Court reversed a court ...

The Supreme Court's ruling on universal injunctions is not the end of all expansive injunctions, but it does end a legal ...

Justice Barrett writes for the Court's majority that universal injunctions likely exceed the equitable power of federal courts.

In a June 27 ruling, the Supreme Court granted the Trump administration’s request to partially halt nationwide injunctions ...

All the familiar policy concerns about universal injunctions against federal laws and policies (that such remedies encourage forum shopping, diminish percolation, risk conflicting injunctions, and ...

The Supreme Court on Friday granted the Trump administration’s request to partially pause rulings by three federal judges ...

In Supreme Court's majority opinion on Trump v. Casa, Barrett used Jackson's own words against her in the judicial equivalent ...

The Supreme Court's decision to limit universal injunctions, which gives lone judges the power to limit executive orders, is seen as a victory for the Trump administration, which will now enjoy a ...

Other provisions covered by Casper's injunction require the heads of federal voter registration agencies to assess citizenship before providing a voter registration form to people enrolled in ...

Good riddance. Even as it ended nationwide injunctions, the Supreme Court left the door open for other forms of relief that are not nationwide injunctions—but that look a whole lot like them.