Judge William Young expressed frustration over the government’s criteria for terminating hundreds of medical research grants.

A federal judge ruled the Trump admin’s $1 billion NIH grant cuts illegal, citing racial discrimination, and ordered funding restored for vaccine, maternal health, and gender identity research.

The Reagan-appointed judge ordered the NIH to restore funds for research related to racial minorities and LGBTQ+ people.

In a ruling issued Monday, the judge called the government’s directives “arbitrary and capricious” and ordered funding for ...

June, a federal judge issued a stinging rebuke to the Trump administration, declaring that its decision to cancel the funding ...

Massachusetts judge decides Trump's termination of NIH grants was illegal and a clear display of "racial discrimination." ...

The courts continue to be the only bulwark against an overreaching executive, writes Nancy Gertner, a former U.S. District Court judge. After the high court’s ruling on nationwide injunctions, it ...

The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) has not yet rescinded directives that led to the cancellation of more than 2,400 ...

U.S. District Judge William Young in Massachusetts said the administration’s process was “arbitrary and capricious” and that it did not follow long-held government rules and standards when it abruptly ...

During his remarks ending the hearing, the judge said he would issue his written order soon. Young’s decision addresses only a fraction of the hundreds of NIH research projects the Trump ...

Guidance from the Office of the General Counsel at the Department of Health and Human Services, obtained by STAT, outlines a ...

U.S. District Judge William Young in Massachusetts said the administration's process was “arbitrary and capricious” and that it did not follow long-held government rules and standards when it ...